Over my 20+ years managing Linux infrastructure, I've worked with several cloud providers and VMs. Among those platforms, I've spent hands-on time with both Cloudways and Vultr, deploying servers, measuring performance, and working through the day-to-day of managing each in production.
To validate my field experience, I ran the same deployment and performance checks across both platforms in production, load time, TTFB, uptime, and day-to-day admin overhead, rather than relying on third-party scorecards. The verdict on Cloudways vs Vultr isn't about which platform is universally "better"; it's about which architecture fits your operational workflow. This guide covers exactly that, including the migration process, real cost over a year, and a technical detail almost nobody mentions (Cloudways can actually run on top of Vultr).
Cloudways is the stronger pick for most site owners who want managed hosting without touching a terminal. Vultr is the stronger pick if you're technical, cost-conscious at scale, or need raw infrastructure (GPU instances, Kubernetes, custom stacks).
Our Production Evaluation Matrix
To fairly evaluate Cloudways and Vultr, we tracked core infrastructure pillars across our live client deployments over a 12-month cycle:
Measured the overhead of setting up multi-app environments, isolated staging, and automated Let's Encrypt pipelines.
Analyzed database response times under heavy concurrent loads comparing the Cloudways caching layer against raw Nginx/PHP-FPM.
Tracked cumulative weekly hours spent manually handling kernel patching, security hardening, and cron monitoring on unmanaged instances.
Evaluated data safety and true downtime metrics during live storage upgrades and compute resource scaling.
How We Arrived at These Numbers
Based on our typical client deployments across Cloudways and Vultr over the past year, here's what we've typically observed. These metrics reflect common patterns we've seen in our own production work, not a controlled, third-party benchmark study, so treat them as directional estimates rather than exact numbers for your specific workload.
Performance & Operational Patterns We've Observed
What Is Cloudways?
Cloudways isn't actually a hosting provider in the traditional sense; it's a managed layer that sits on top of cloud infrastructure from DigitalOcean, Vultr, AWS, GCP, or Akamai (formerly Linode). You pick the underlying cloud, and Cloudways handles the server administration: automatic backups, one-click staging environments, built-in caching (Varnish, Redis, Memcached), free SSL via Let's Encrypt, a dedicated firewall, and 24/7 managed support.
In practice, this means you get root-level performance without root-level responsibility. You never SSH in to patch a kernel or configure Nginx by hand; Cloudways' dashboard does that for you. This is why it's popular with agencies managing dozens of client WordPress or Laravel sites, and with developers who'd rather ship features than babysit servers. Two recent additions worth knowing about: the new Lightning Stack, an NGINX + PHP-FPM architecture built for faster, more consistent performance on dynamic sites (ecommerce, LMS, membership platforms), and Cloudways Copilot, an AI-powered troubleshooting assistant that surfaces and can auto-resolve common server issues.
| Founded | 2011 · owned by DigitalOcean since 2022 |
|---|---|
| Underlying Clouds | DigitalOcean, Vultr, AWS, Google Cloud, Akamai (Linode) |
| Starting Price | $11/mo |
| Management | Fully managed |
| Best For | Agencies, Startups, WordPress/Laravel developers, non-technical founders |
The tradeoff is cost and flexibility: you pay a markup on top of the raw cloud server price, and you're somewhat boxed into Cloudways' supported stacks and workflows.
- No server management, patching, or security config required
- Automatic backups, staging, and free SSL included on every plan
- Choice of 5 underlying cloud providers from one dashboard
- 24/7 managed support included at no extra cost
- New Lightning Stack meaningfully improves dynamic-site performance
- 20–220% markup over raw cloud server pricing
- No GPU or AI-specific compute instances
- Boxed into Cloudways' supported stacks and workflows
- Costs escalate quickly as you add servers or storage
- Abstracted environment: application-level SSH access only, no true root (sudo) access to modify core OS or kernel parameters
Verified Support Reliability
Cloudways' third-party review scores, independently verifiable on Trustpilot and G2:
Ratings current as of publication; check Trustpilot and G2 directly for the latest scores and individual reviews.
What Is Vultr?
Vultr is a straightforward, unmanaged VPS provider. You spin up a server, anywhere from a $2.50/month IPv6-only instance (or $3.50/month for a usable IPv4 512MB tier) to high-performance dedicated CPU, bare metal, or GPU instances, and you get full root access on a blank Linux (or Windows) box. Everything from there is on you: OS hardening, security patches, firewall rules, backups, monitoring, and stack configuration.
That's a feature, not a limitation, for the right user. Vultr's 33+ global data centers (including its newest region in Milan, Italy), flat hourly billing, and expanding platform services (managed Kubernetes, managed databases, object storage, load balancers) make it a genuine infrastructure platform, not just a VPS reseller. Vultr has also rolled out VX1 Cloud Compute, a newer instance line built for AI, SaaS, and database workloads that Vultr claims delivers meaningfully better price-to-performance than comparable hyperscaler plans. Sysadmins, DevOps teams, and cost-conscious technical founders often prefer Vultr precisely because there's no managed-hosting markup: you pay for compute, not hand-holding.
| Founded | 2014 · self-funded, privately held |
|---|---|
| Data Centers | 33+ global regions across 19+ countries |
| Starting Price | $2.50/mo (IPv6-only) · $3.50/mo (512MB, IPv4) · $5/mo (1GB, IPv4) |
| Management | Unmanaged (full root access) |
| Best For | Sysadmins, DevOps teams, custom infrastructure, AI/GPU workloads |
- Lowest baseline compute cost: no managed-hosting markup
- Broadest global footprint among non-hyperscaler clouds (33+ regions)
- Dedicated GPU instances for AI/ML workloads
- Managed Kubernetes, managed databases, object storage available
- New VX1 Cloud Compute line targets strong price-to-performance
- Free network-level Cloud Firewall drops malicious packets and DDoS traffic before they ever consume your VM's compute cycles
- Steep learning curve: CLI/SSH required, no managed dashboard
- You own all patching, backups, and security configuration
- Support is ticket-based, not 24/7 white-glove managed support
- Cheapest $2.50 plan is IPv6-only, not usable for most production sites
Cloudways vs Vultr: Our Hands-On Verdict
Rather than leaning on third-party scorecards that shift month to month, this verdict is built entirely from our own deployment testing across both platforms over the past year.
- Managed hosting (Cloudways) won clearly on setup speed and ongoing time cost. Provisioning a multi-app stack took about 1.5 minutes versus 35+ minutes on a comparable unmanaged setup, and monthly maintenance stayed under an hour versus 8–12 hours per ~10 production stacks on Vultr.
- Raw infrastructure (Vultr) won on raw compute cost and architectural control. No managed-hosting markup, full root access, and the ability to run GPU, Kubernetes, or custom stacks that Cloudways doesn't support at all.
The bottom line: Cloudways wins on deployment speed and hands-off operations; Vultr wins for teams who value infrastructure control and lower raw cost over convenience. Neither platform is universally "better," the right pick depends entirely on whether your time or your compute budget is the scarcer resource.
Head-to-Head Comparison
| Feature | Cloudways | Vultr |
|---|---|---|
| Starting Price | $11/mo (DigitalOcean node) – $14/mo (Vultr node) | $2.50/mo (IPv6) · $3.50/mo (512MB, IPv4) · $5/mo (1GB, IPv4) |
| Management | ✅ Fully managed | ❌ Unmanaged (DIY) |
| Automatic Backups | ✅ Included | Manual or paid add-on |
| Server Locations | 65+ (via underlying clouds) | 33+ global data centers |
| Beginner Friendly | ✅ Low: dashboard-driven | ❌ Steep: CLI/SSH required |
| GPU / AI Compute | ❌ Not offered directly | ✅ Dedicated GPU instances |
| Kubernetes / Managed DB | ❌ No | ✅ Vultr Kubernetes Engine, Managed DBs |
| 24/7 Managed Support | ✅ Included | ❌ Ticket-based only |
| Best For | Agencies, Startups, WordPress/Laravel devs, non-technical founders | Sysadmins, DevOps teams, custom infrastructure |
Real Linux Admin Scenarios: Which Platform Actually Wins
Generic "developers vs. sysadmins" advice breaks down once you look at specific workloads. Here's how the two platforms actually compare for the scenarios Linux admins deal with day to day.
Winner: Vultr. Cloudways has no Kubernetes offering at all; it's built around single-server PHP/Node app hosting, not container orchestration. Vultr Kubernetes Engine (VKE) gives you a managed control plane with worker nodes you can scale via CLI or dashboard, e.g. vultr-cli kubernetes node-pool create to add capacity. If your workload involves container orchestration, this isn't a close call.
Winner: Cloudways. The multi-app dashboard lets you spin up a new WordPress or Laravel app under an existing server in a couple of clicks, with per-app staging, one-click PHP version switching, and centralized SSH/SFTP access. Running the same client load on Vultr means provisioning, securing, and monitoring each server yourself: viable, but it's real ongoing admin time per client.
Winner: Vultr. Full root access means you can install Docker, set up a self-hosted runner, or wire up a custom CI/CD pipeline (GitHub Actions, GitLab CI) exactly how you want it. Cloudways' managed environment is optimized for its supported PHP/Node stacks, not arbitrary container workflows, so you're working against the platform rather than with it if you need custom orchestration.
Depends on your stack. If your backend is a standard PHP/Node API, Cloudways' managed monitoring, auto-healing, and 24/7 support reduce the operational burden of keeping it up. If it's a custom Go, Python, or Node service needing specific runtime versions, process managers, or a load balancer across regions, Vultr's Load Balancers plus multiple instances across its 33+ data centers give you more architectural control for building real high-availability setups.
Winner: Vultr, for compute-heavy database workloads. Vultr's High Frequency and Dedicated CPU instances, plus its managed database product, give you dedicated resources without a managed-hosting markup layered on top, which matters once you're scaling database size and query load. Cloudways can run a standard MySQL/MariaDB stack fine for small-to-mid ERP workloads, but heavy database scaling gets progressively more expensive under its markup model.
Who Should Choose Which? (By Role, Not Just Feature)
Most comparisons stop at "developers vs. sysadmins." That's too vague to be useful. Here's a sharper breakdown:
- Solo bloggers / small business owners → Cloudways. You want backups and updates to just happen.
- Digital agencies managing multiple client sites → Cloudways. The multi-server dashboard and staging environments save real hours per client.
- SaaS founders needing GPU or ML compute → Vultr. Cloudways doesn't offer GPU instances at all; this isn't a close call.
- DevOps teams building custom infrastructure → Vultr, especially if you're already using Vultr Kubernetes Engine or managed databases as part of a broader stack.
- Linux sysadmins who want root control and lower baseline cost → Vultr, particularly at scale where Cloudways' per-server markup adds up.
Why Different Users Land on Different Sides
A monthly bill tells you what something costs, not why someone chose it. In practice, the split tends to come down to what's scarcer for a given team: time or budget. Users who value peace of mind, automated backups, and not needing in-house server expertise tend to land on Cloudways. Technically fluent teams who'd rather manage their own stack, and pocket the savings from skipping the managed-hosting markup, tend to land on Vultr. Neither instinct is wrong; they're optimizing for different constraints, not different quality tiers.
The Real Cost Over 12 Months (Not Just the Sticker Price)
The month-one price you see on either homepage rarely matches what you pay a year in. On Cloudways, budget for the base server tier, plus Cloudways' management markup, plus potential add-ons for extra backup retention, staging apps beyond your plan's limit, or a dedicated CDN. A small WordPress site running Cloudways on a Vultr server starts at $14/month but commonly lands closer to $20–30/month once add-ons are factored in.
On Vultr, the base compute cost is lower, but you're absorbing costs Cloudways bundles in: time (or a sysadmin's salary) to configure backups and security, plus any managed add-ons you choose to bolt on, like Vultr's own managed database or object storage if you don't want to run those yourself. For a technical user, Vultr's true cost stays close to the sticker price. For a non-technical user trying to DIY it, the "hidden cost" is risk: a misconfigured server or missed backup can cost far more than the monthly savings.
Migrating Between Them (What Nobody Else Tells You)
If you're moving an existing site, the two platforms require very different migration paths. Moving into Cloudways is the easier direction: their migration plugin and support team will typically move a WordPress or PHP site with minimal downtime. Moving into Vultr means provisioning a server from scratch, installing your stack (web server, database, PHP/runtime, SSL) manually or via a script, then migrating files and databases yourself. Expect real time investment or a hired hand unless you're already comfortable at the command line. If you're currently on Cloudways and considering Vultr purely for cost savings, factor in this one-time migration effort against your monthly savings before deciding it's worth it.
The Detail Everyone Misses: Cloudways Runs On Vultr
Here's the wrinkle that makes the "vs" framing slightly misleading: Cloudways lets you choose Vultr as your underlying cloud provider. So the real decision for some users isn't "Cloudways or Vultr"; it's "Vultr with Cloudways' management layer on top, or Vultr raw." If you like Vultr's infrastructure and global footprint but want the managed convenience, you can effectively get both. This is worth knowing before you assume it's strictly either/or.
When to Choose Cloudways
Choose Cloudways if:
- You want backups, updates, and security handled for you
- You're a developer, not a sysadmin, and want to focus on code, not infrastructure
- You're running WordPress, Laravel, or similar PHP/Node apps
- You manage multiple client sites and want a unified dashboard
- You'd rather pay a predictable markup than spend time on server maintenance
Get automatic backups, built-in caching, and 24/7 support without touching a terminal.
When to Choose Vultr
Choose Vultr if:
- You're a Linux sysadmin comfortable with full root access
- You want the lowest possible baseline compute cost
- You need GPU instances, Kubernetes, or managed databases as part of a broader infrastructure stack
- You're running custom or non-standard software that managed platforms don't support well
- You're optimizing for control and cost efficiency over convenience
Deploy in under 60 seconds with full root access across 33+ global data centers.
Frequently Asked Questions
▸ Is Cloudways better than Vultr for WordPress?
For most WordPress sites, yes: Cloudways' automatic backups, built-in caching, and one-click staging remove the server-management overhead that WordPress site owners rarely want to deal with. If you're comfortable managing your own server stack, running WordPress directly on Vultr is cheaper, but you take on that maintenance yourself.
▸ Can I use Vultr and Cloudways together?
Yes. Cloudways lets you choose Vultr as your underlying cloud provider directly from its dashboard, so you get Vultr's infrastructure and global data center footprint with Cloudways' managed layer on top, with no separate signup or manual integration required.
▸ Which is cheaper long-term, Cloudways or Vultr?
Vultr is cheaper on raw compute at every tier. Cloudways charges a markup for its managed layer, which typically pays for itself in saved time if you're not comfortable doing server administration yourself. At scale, or for technical users, Vultr's total cost advantage grows.
▸ Do I need coding or Linux skills to use Vultr?
Not strictly, but you'll need to be comfortable with the command line to get real value from it. Vultr gives you a blank server with full root access; there's no managed dashboard handling backups, security, or updates for you the way Cloudways does.
▸ Which platform offers GPU hosting for AI workloads?
Vultr, not Cloudways. Vultr offers dedicated NVIDIA and AMD GPU instances alongside its newer VX1 Cloud Compute line built for AI and database workloads. Cloudways does not offer GPU instances directly on any of its supported cloud providers.
Linux Security: Hardening Comparison
Security posture looks very different depending on which side of the managed/unmanaged line you're on.
| Area | Cloudways | Vultr |
|---|---|---|
| Firewall | Dedicated firewall pre-configured and managed as part of the platform | You configure it yourself: ufw/iptables on the box, or Vultr's free Cloud Firewall at the network level via dashboard/API |
| Security patching | Server-level OS and stack patches applied automatically | Manual, or automate with unattended-upgrades and your own cron/monitoring |
| Backups | Automated, configurable frequency and retention built into the dashboard | Manual snapshots (billed per GB), or self-managed with rsync/restic to Vultr Object Storage |
| Monitoring | Built-in server and app monitoring in the dashboard | Basic usage graphs included; real alerting means wiring up UptimeRobot, Better Stack, or Prometheus/Grafana yourself |
| SSL certificates | Free Let's Encrypt, one-click issue and auto-renew | Manual via certbot (e.g. certbot --nginx), with your own renewal cron job |
The pattern holds throughout: Cloudways trades configurability for a smaller attack surface to manage yourself, while Vultr gives you the tools to build exactly the security posture you want, provided you actually do it. An unpatched, unmonitored Vultr box is a real risk; the same box on Cloudways has that baseline covered by default.
Who Fixes What: A Practical Breakdown
What you need to fix depends entirely on which hosting infrastructure or migration path you choose. Here's a direct breakdown, grouped by who's actually responsible.
When deploying a blank, unmanaged Vultr instance, nothing is configured out of the box. You're responsible for manually troubleshooting and fixing:
- Broken SSL certificate renewals: you must manually configure
certbot(e.g.certbot --nginx) and maintain your own cron jobs. If a renewal fails, you have to log in and fix it to bring your site back online. - OS and security vulnerabilities: you must manually patch kernel updates and packages, or set up tools like
unattended-upgradesyourself. - Database crashes and resource spikes: because Vultr only provides basic usage graphs, you must manually wire up and configure alerting tools (Prometheus, Grafana, UptimeRobot) to catch and fix service drops.
- Backup failures or data loss: you have to manually design your backup architecture, configure paid snapshots, or script custom pipelines using
rsyncorrestic.
Cloudways is structured to automate basic server administration so you don't have to troubleshoot infrastructure-level failures:
- Service crashes & disk exhaustion: core services are built to auto-heal. If resources spike or the disk fills up, the AI-powered Cloudways Copilot detects the issue and lets you fix it with a single click using its SmartFix feature.
- Broken directory permissions: instead of manually fixing file ownership errors or web server configuration blocks on the command line, environment permissions and app isolation are fixed automatically via the graphical dashboard.
If you're moving an existing site, you'll face distinct technical hurdles depending on your migration direction:
- Fixing the environment when moving into Vultr: you must build the target stack entirely from scratch, resolving mismatched runtime/PHP versions, manually configuring the database server, installing the web server, and fixing file paths during a manual data transfer.
- Fixing the environment when moving into Cloudways: there's very little for you to manually fix here. Cloudways provides a dedicated migration plugin and an engineering support team to handle the migration and fix configuration bugs with minimal downtime.
Final Verdict
Based on our own hands-on testing, Cloudways is the stronger pick for most site owners: it wins clearly on deployment speed and ongoing time cost, and that's a real, meaningful edge. But that lead reflects a platform built for managed convenience, not one that's objectively "better" in every dimension.
Vultr remains the stronger choice for a specific, technical audience: sysadmins, DevOps engineers, and cost-conscious teams who'd rather control their own stack than pay for convenience they don't need.
If you want a one-line answer: for Linux sysadmins and DevOps teams, choose Vultr. For developers, agencies, startup, and non-technical founders, choose Cloudways. Either way, know that you can get the best of both worlds by simply launching a Vultr server directly through the Cloudways dashboard.
This article contains affiliate links. See our Affiliate Disclosure for details.
